|
Published:
August 8, 2006
Controversial
Burnham-On-Sea wind farm bid is rejected

A
controversial bid to build five wind turbines on the outskirts
of Burnham-On-Sea was unanimously thrown out by district planners
on Tuesday morning (August 8th).
Sedgemoor
District Council's Development Control Committee decided not to
allow Ecotricity to use the Inner Farm site to build its proposed
wind farm - much to the delight of protesters fighting the plans
(above).
Councillors
threw out the application after considering the overall case and
hearing from local groups.
At
the meeting, members of FORCE (Families
for Clean Energy) spoke out in favour of the development,
while opposing organisation KNOll to Wind Farm outlined why it
believed the scheme would not be in the best interests of the
area.
After
the decision, Sedgemoor District Council spokeswoman Claire Faun
outlined the three key reasons for refusal. These were as follows:
1.
Notwithstanding the significant issue of renewable energy provision
and the potential shortfall in the Somerset County target, the
proposal would lead to an unacceptably adverse impact on the character
of the landscape. By virtue of the location and size of the turbines
and their associated blades, the proposal would adversely affect
local landscape character when viewed from publicly accessible
vantage points and the wider area. This development proposal,
and in particular the mass, height and design of the turbine structures,
does not replace, repair or otherwise add to the stock of features
that create local distinctiveness. The proposal therefore fails
to accord with Planning Policy Statement 22 Renewable Energy,
Policy 64 of the Somerset and Exmoor National Park Joint Structure
Plan, and policies CNE2, CNE17 and criteria (a) of policy PCS5
of the Sedgemoor District Local Plan.
2.
The proposed turbines and their associated blades will have an
unacceptable impact on the amenities of a number of properties
and their occupiers within the ural linear settlement of Brent
Knoll and in particular the south west of Brent Street which are
within close proximity to the wind turbines by virtue of the visual
effect when viewed from these properties. As such it would not
meet all the criteria (b) within policy PCS5 of the Sedgemoor
District Local Plan.
3.
The proposed turbines and their associated blades would be seen
in close juxtaposition with the village of Brent Knoll, the Grade
1 listed Church of St Michael, and in views from Public Rights
of Way in the vicinity. The setting of this Listed Building, characterised
by a rural landscape with groups of trees and woodlands on the
lower slopes of the Knoll surrounding the church tower would not
be preserved and the proposal is therefore contrary to Planning
Policy Guidance 15 (Planning and The Historic Environment), and
Policy HE11 and Policy PCS5(b) of the Sedgemoor District Local
Plan.
The
applicants, Ecotricity, have six months if they wish to appeal
to the Planning Inspectorate.
KNOll
to Windfarm 'delighted' with the decision...
Spokesman
Andrew Manning told Burnham-On-Sea.com: "This is a triumph
for local democracy, common sense, and the application of planning
policy.
"It has been clear to us for some time that under the criteria
set out by Central Government under PPS22 the proposed location
for this wind farm was inappropriate because the environmental,
economic and social amenity implications would be so significant.
The application also was contrary to a signficant number of local
planning policies."
"This view has been shared by the three local Parish Councils
consulted, by over 90% of respondents to the application, by the
Council's officers, and now, unanimously, by the Councillors themselves."
"Whilst it appears that Ecotricity, the proposed developer,
may appeal against this decision, we trust that, if this is the
case, the appointed Planning Inspector will consider this particularly
site on its own merits - or clear lack of merits as we understand
Government policy intends."
"As
KNOll to Windfarm has stressed all along, after all, this is a
debate about the suitability of this particular location, not
about global warming, the Government's energy policy, forms of
renewable energy, or nuclear power."
RELATED
LINKS:
Decision
expected over Burnham wind farm
Standing
room only at wind farm public meeting
Pro-wind
farm group to speak at two meetings
Sedgemoor
planners recommend scheme be rejected
'Let's
work together' says KNOll To Wind Farm group
Somerset
County Council gives green light to more wind farms
Wind
farm boss hits back in war of words
11th
hour change to Brent Knoll wind farm plans
Burnham
MP attacks county council plans for more wind farms
Public
meeting to be held on wind farm plans
Wind
farm pressure group sets out its objections
Burnham
Without parish councillors vote against wind farm
David
Bellamy adds his support to wind farm protests
Pro-wind
farm group hits back after council's decision
Protesters
celebrate after town planners back them
Wind
farm protestors hit back in row over tourism
Actor
John Cleese supports wind farm protest group
Wind
farm would 'hurt local tourism' claim protesters
Council
announces start of Burnham wind farm consultation period
Protest
group's anger after posters are pulled down
Wind
farm boss hits back in row over power generation
Wind
farm boss challenged to meet protesters
Protestors
challenge Ecotricity power generation figures
Wind
farm bid labled 'invalid' by district planners
14
new photos of proposed wind farm are released
Wind
farm application reaches district planners
New
photomotage images of wind farm released
Shock
photos of wind farm accidents "show the risks"
MP
David Heathcoat-Amory gives his backing to wind group
MP
to visit wind farm protestors at Brent Knoll
New
pro-wind farm group backs Edithmead wind farm plans
'Property
prices will be hit by proposed wind farm' claims action group
Wind farm group pushes
green agenda
Ecotricity holds wind farm open day
New action group formed to fight wind farm
Council leader slams plans for wind farm
Huge new wind farm proposed for Edithmead
|